The Commission presented posters at the National Blood Symposium held in Brisbane on 11-12 June 2015. This Symposium was a free event co-sponsored by the National Blood Authority, Queensland Health and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The event built on the inaugural 2013 National Blood Symposiums that were held to support Australian health providers to implement Standard 7: Blood and Blood Products of the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards.
A poster was also accepted at the Improving Healthcare International Convention held in Melbourne on 16-18 November 2015. The Improving Healthcare International Convention was Australia’s largest quality improvement event, hosted by the Improvement Foundation, a leading provider of quality improvement programs in Australia, including the National Patient Blood Management Collaborative (NPBMC) and the Australian Primary Care Collaborative (APCC) programs. The Convention showcased improvements, innovations and practical solutions from international and national experts, innovators and leaders.
The Learning and Development Team at the Mater Private Hospital, Sydney developed a Six Minute Intensive Training (SMIT) poster to promote participation in the Collaborative.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
A |
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY WITH APICAL SUSPENSION
A. Traction on cervix with circumferential incision of vaginal mucosa (orientation)
B. Delivery of uterus through posterior cul-de-sac with cut pedicles
C. Uterosacral vaginal vault suspension
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
C |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Vault prolapse (post hysterectomy) | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
A |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Isolated rectocele | GoR* |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
C |
|
C |
|
D |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Isolated cystocele | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Prolapse surgery and lower urinary tract functions | GoR* |
---|---|
Women with POP + SUI | |
|
A |
|
A |
Women with POP + occult SUI | |
|
B |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A |
Continent women with POP | |
|
B |
Women with POP and Overactive Bladder (OAB) | |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
|
A |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
C |
|
D |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) considers there is a lack of adequate scientific evidence for it to be satisfied that the risks to patients associated with the use of single incision mini‐slings for the treatment of SUI outweigh their benefits. These products have been removed from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG)
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
Retropubic versus transobturator mid-urethral sling | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
Retropubic versus transobturator mid-urethral sling | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
Pubovaginal (fascial) sling | GoR* |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
– |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
|
C |
|
– |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
GoR* | |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance