By admin
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
A |
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY WITH APICAL SUSPENSION
A. Traction on cervix with circumferential incision of vaginal mucosa (orientation)
B. Delivery of uterus through posterior cul-de-sac with cut pedicles
C. Uterosacral vaginal vault suspension
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
C |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Vault prolapse (post hysterectomy) | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
A |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Isolated rectocele | GoR* |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
C |
|
C |
|
D |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Isolated cystocele | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
Prolapse surgery and lower urinary tract functions | GoR* |
---|---|
Women with POP + SUI | |
|
A |
|
A |
Women with POP + occult SUI | |
|
B |
|
A |
|
A |
|
A |
Continent women with POP | |
|
B |
Women with POP and Overactive Bladder (OAB) | |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
GoR* | |
|
A |
|
B |
|
B |
|
C |
|
C |
|
D |
* Grades of Recommendation
Adapted from International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). 2017 ICI Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. (urogynaecology.com.au)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the ICI (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) considers there is a lack of adequate scientific evidence for it to be satisfied that the risks to patients associated with the use of single incision mini‐slings for the treatment of SUI outweigh their benefits. These products have been removed from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG)
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
Retropubic versus transobturator mid-urethral sling | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
Retropubic versus transobturator mid-urethral sling | GoR* |
---|---|
|
A |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
Pubovaginal (fascial) sling | GoR* |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
– |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
|
B |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
GoR* | |
---|---|
|
B |
|
C |
|
– |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance
GoR* | |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
* Grades of Recommendation
This pathway is adapted from UroGynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA) Surgical treatment of SUI pathway (2016)
The Grade of Recommendation has been derived from the 5th International Consultation on Incontinence (see Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1781 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-013-2168-x and expert opinion during the Commission’s development of the guidance