Skip to main content

Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard

Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to public health. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard supports quality improvement initiatives conducted by health services and clinicians to help reduce antimicrobial resistance rates and preserve the effectiveness of antimicrobial medicines. 

The goals of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard are to:

  • ensure the appropriate use and review of antimicrobials to optimise patient outcomes, lessen the harms of adverse effects, and reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance
  • ensure that a patient receives optimal antimicrobial therapy for the treatment or prevention of an infection, including assurance when an antimicrobial is not needed. This means using the right antimicrobial to treat the condition, at the right dose, at the right frequency, by the right route of administration, at the right time and for the right duration, based on accurate assessment and timely review.

What is antimicrobial stewardship?

Antimicrobial medicines, such as antibiotics, are important for treating and preventing infections. They have been called the miracle drugs of modern medicine. However, when microbes become resistant to an antimicrobial medicine, it no longer works to treat or prevent infections. Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem in healthcare settings and in the community. 

Antimicrobial stewardship is a set of strategies to ensure that antimicrobial medicines are used appropriately, to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance.
 

About the Standard 

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard was published in 2020 and includes:  

  • eight quality statements to support safe and appropriate care when prescribing antimicrobials
  • a set of indicators to support monitoring and quality improvement

We also have resources for clinicians, healthcare services and consumers to support implementation of the Standard. 

-

Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard

PDF

2.7 MB

Quality Statements

Quality Statement 1 – Life-threatening conditions

A patient with a life-threatening condition due to a suspected infection receives an appropriate antimicrobial immediately, without waiting for the results of investigations.

When treating a patient with suspected sepsis1 or another life-threatening infection, administer appropriate empiric antimicrobials as soon as possible. There should be prompt access to the appropriate antimicrobials.

Obtain clinical specimens as appropriate, but do not delay administration of antimicrobials and do not wait for results of investigations. When results are received, immediately reassess the treatment.

If there is no immediate access to the appropriate antimicrobials, arrange for immediate transfer of the patient to an acute care facility; for example, ambulance transfer to a hospital. This is relevant in community settings or for some rural hospitals. 

End-of-life care

When considering the administration of antimicrobials for patients with life-threatening or serious infections, the patient’s advance care plan should be considered. Safe and high-quality end-of-life care should be aligned with the values, needs and wishes of the individual, and their family or carers. For ethical reasons, it is important not to harm patients approaching the end of life by providing burdensome investigations and treatments that can be of no benefit.2

Ensure that relevant clinical pathways and an appropriate local antimicrobial formulary are available so that clinicians can give optimal antimicrobial treatment promptly and within recommended time frames to patients with life-threatening infections. 

Infections can be serious and may be life threatening. Examples of these conditions include: 

  • Sepsis (when the body’s response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs)
  • Meningitis (an infection of the tissues lining the brain)
  • Necrotising fasciitis (a serious infection from a flesh-eating bacteria).

If you are unwell with a serious infection, you will be given appropriate medicine to treat the infection without delay.

The Commission’s Sepsis Clinical Care Standard is relevant to this quality statement.

Quality Statement 2 – Use of guidelines

When a patient is prescribed an antimicrobial, this is done in accordance with the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines and the antimicrobial formulary.

Prescribe an antimicrobial according to the current Therapeutic Guidelines or locally endorsed guidelines, including the appropriate active ingredient, dose, formulation, route and frequency of administration, and duration for the patient’s clinical condition.

Prescribe, dispense and administer antimicrobials in line with local antimicrobial formularies and restrictions, where available, including those applied to broad-spectrum antimicrobials.

Consider the individual patient’s characteristics, such as age, weight, renal function, allergies, other medicines prescribed and other health conditions.

Ensure clinicians have access to and use the current Therapeutic Guidelines and evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines when prescribing antimicrobials.

Ensure clinicians have access to and use the local antimicrobial formulary, as required, and that it is evidence based. Monitor adherence with the antimicrobial formulary, including broad-spectrum antimicrobials.

If you are prescribed a medicine for an infection, your clinician will discuss which medicine is best for you, based on national or local recommendations. Your clinician should also consider any allergies and other health conditions you may have, as well as the cause of your infection. 

Locally endorsed guidelines

Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic provides national, evidence-based guidelines for antimicrobial use in Australia.3 It is regularly revised, with interim targeted updates made in response to significant changes in evidence and practice, which may be triggered by feedback from the healthcare community. However, in some cases, evidence-based and local adaptations that have been through a formal, robust endorsement process may be more relevant to local patterns of antimicrobial resistance or to specific patient populations requiring a localised approach or with highly specialised diagnoses out of the scope of Therapeutic Guidelines. It is important to ensure that local adaptations of guidelines are based on Therapeutic Guidelines. Any deviation should be accompanied by a clear rationale based on published clinical evidence and local epidemiology, and documented and endorsed by a governing body. Endorsing bodies may include peer review from a drug and therapeutics committee, an antimicrobial stewardship committee, a medicines advisory committee, or equivalent. 

For more information about the requirements of locally endorsed guidelines and antimicrobial formularies, including restriction lists, see page 9 of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard.

Quality Statement 3 – Adverse reactions to antimicrobials

When an adverse reaction (including an allergy) to an antimicrobial is reported by a patient or recorded in their healthcare record, the active ingredient(s), date, nature and severity of the reaction are assessed and documented. This enables the most appropriate antimicrobial to be used when required.

Before prescribing, dispensing or administering an antimicrobial, consider the patient’s previous adverse reactions to medicines. Check the healthcare record and ask the patient about their previous adverse reactions, including the active ingredient(s), date the adverse event occurred, nature and severity of the reaction (including how it was managed), and where they recorded it, such as on an allergy bracelet or a medicines list. If any of the essential elements for assessing an adverse reaction are unknown (see below), this should be explicitly documented in the patient’s healthcare record.

The essential elements for assessing an adverse reaction are the:

  • Patient’s description of the event (what happened to the patient)
  • Nature of the reaction (diagnosis of the reaction)
  • Active ingredient(s) thought to have caused the adverse reaction
  • Assessment of likelihood (certainty it was caused by the active ingredient)
  • Severity of event (consequence to the patient, for example hospitalisation)
  • Date and location of the care (because the original record may have more detail).

Assess the likelihood of the adverse reaction being caused by the active ingredient(s). Factors relevant to your decision about whether to use an antimicrobial or not include the potential for the adverse reaction to recur and the likely consequences to the patient. Use information about the patient’s adverse reaction history, along with evidence-based guidelines, to assess the most appropriate antimicrobial to use. Review the accuracy of the documentation and update the patient’s healthcare record.

Communicate any changes to a patient’s adverse reaction or allergy status to the patient and their regular clinician (for example, in My Health Record or a discharge summary for the general practitioner). It may also be necessary to update the patient’s medicines list.

If a patient experiences a new adverse reaction to an antimicrobial, document the essential elements (as above) in the patient’s healthcare record. Any new or suspected adverse reactions should also be recorded in the organisation-wide incident reporting system and reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration.4

Ensure processes are in place to support clinicians to document adverse reactions to medicines that are reported or experienced by a patient in the patient’s healthcare record. 

The essential elements to document for an adverse reaction are the:

  • Patient’s description of the event (what happened to the patient)
  • Nature of the reaction (diagnosis of the reaction)
  • Active ingredient(s) thought to have caused the adverse reaction
  • Assessment of likelihood (certainty it was caused by the active ingredient)
  • Severity of event (consequence to the patient, for example hospitalisation)
  • Date and location of the care (because the original record may have more detail).

Ensure processes are in place for clinicians to review and update information about patients’ adverse reactions to medicines in their healthcare records at each encounter including the My Health Record system.

Ensure guidelines are available for clinicians to assess adverse reactions to antimicrobials and to use the most appropriate antimicrobial when required.

Ensure relevant information about adverse reactions to medicines is available for clinicians to provide to patients.

Ensure processes are in place to review adverse reactions to antimicrobials in the organisation-wide incident reporting system and report them to the Therapeutic Goods Administration.4

Adverse reactions are any unwanted effects of a medicine. Many adverse reactions are expected side effects of medicines, and can range from mild to severe. An ‘allergic reaction’ is one type of adverse reaction.

If you have ever had an unwanted response to a medicine used to treat an infection, even if it was many years ago, talk to your clinician. They will ask you about what happened to find out whether it was because of the medicine, how severe it was and what it means for your care. As a result, your treatment may change and your healthcare record will be updated. Important changes will be communicated to you and your regular doctor.

If you have had an adverse reaction to a medicine, it is important that this information is added to your healthcare record. You can also review and update your information in your My Health Record. Carry a list of your medicines with you, and make sure that it includes the most up-to-date information about your previous adverse reactions to medicines, including allergies.

Quality Statement 4 – Microbiological testing

A patient with a suspected infection has appropriate samples taken for microbiology testing as clinically indicated, preferably before starting antimicrobial therapy.

Obtain appropriate samples for microbiology testing when clinically indicated and before starting antimicrobial therapy whenever possible. This ensures that treatment can be specific for the infecting organism, and that the most appropriate narrow-spectrum antimicrobial is used.

For patients with a life-threatening or serious infection (such as sepsis), obtain clinical specimens as appropriate but start administering antimicrobials as soon as possible. Reassess the treatment as soon as the test results are available.

Follow guidelines for appropriate microbiological testing, such as Therapeutic Guidelines.

Ensure clinicians have access to and use the current Therapeutic Guidelines and evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines for clinically appropriate microbiological testing.

Ensure systems are in place for clinicians to take samples for microbiology testing before starting antimicrobial therapy, when clinically indicated, and for the results to be available to clinicians in a timely manner.

Before you are given medicines to treat an infection, your clinician will try to find out what is causing the infection. This will help them to decide which medicine is best for you. You may need to have a sample taken – for example, from your blood (a blood test), urine (a urine test) or a wound (wound swab) to find out what kind of microbe (sometimes known as a bug) is causing the infection. It may be important to start treating the infection straight away, before you have the test results. However, your medicine can be changed later if needed. 

Quality Statement 5 – Patient information and shared decision making

A patient with an infection, or at risk of an infection, is provided with information about their condition and treatment options in a way that they can understand. If antimicrobials are prescribed, information on how to use them, when to stop, potential side effects and a review plan is discussed with the patient.

Discuss with the patient the expected progression of the infection and the potential benefits and harms of the treatment options, which may or may not include antimicrobials. This discussion should consider the patient’s preferences and needs.

If antimicrobials are not needed, reassure the patient and inform them of other treatments that can help with symptoms.

If antimicrobials are needed, discuss with the patient the importance of using antimicrobials as prescribed, how long to take them, any potential adverse effects, any potential drug interactions with existing medicines, and when the treatment will be reviewed or ceased.

Provide verbal and/or written information and resources to the patient about their treatment options and their antimicrobial therapy. Document in the patient’s healthcare record what patient information was conveyed, including the provision of written information such as a consumer medicine information sheet, and the outcome of the shared decision making process. Examples include a hospital discharge referral, or an outpatient clinic note.

Ensure systems are in place for clinicians to provide patients and/or their carers with information and advice on antimicrobial treatment options.

Ensure systems are in place so that clinicians discuss with patients and/or their carers the need to take antimicrobials as prescribed, how long to take them, any potential side effects and whether their treatment requires review.

Provide high-quality written patient materials and resources for use by clinicians and patients.

Monitor patient understanding of information provided for antimicrobial therapy and evidence of shared decision making, for example, qualitative patient surveys, patient-reported experience measures, patient-reported outcome measures and/or measuring uptake of shared decision making tools. See Appendix C of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard for more information.

Ensure processes are in place to ensure information is communicated to the patient at transitions of care (such as on referral in a community setting, or on admission to or discharge from hospital) about their treatment options and antimicrobial plan.

If you have an infection, or are at risk of developing an infection, your clinician will talk to you about your treatment options. This may mean taking medicines depending on the type or risk of infection you have. Your clinician will explain the possible benefits and harms (the good things and bad things) that might happen.

If you decide to take the medicine, your clinician will give you instructions about what you need to do. It is important that you follow these instructions correctly so that the medicine can work to fight your infection. Talk to your clinician if you are not sure what do, or if you have questions.

Some medicines may have side effects. Understanding the possible side effects can help you know what to expect.

Some other things that you need to know about the antimicrobial medicine are:

  • when to start the medicine
  • how many times a day to take, use or apply the medicine
  • whether to take tablets or capsules with food or on an empty stomach
  • how the medicine will affect other medicines you use
  • what the potential side effects are
  • signs or symptoms of when to seek urgent care, depending on the type or risk of infection
  • when to stop the medicine. 

You may need another appointment with your clinician to check that the medicine is working.

Quality Statement 6 – Documentation

When a patient is prescribed an antimicrobial, the indication, active ingredient, dose, frequency and route of administration, and the intended duration or review plan are documented in the patient’s healthcare record.

When prescribing antimicrobials, document the indication, active ingredient, dose, frequency and route of administration, intended duration, and a review plan in the patient’s healthcare record. If required, document any plans for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Ensure a system is in place so that when clinicians prescribe antimicrobials, they document the clinical reason, active ingredient, dose, frequency and route of administration, intended duration and a treatment review plan in the patient’s healthcare record. Where electronic healthcare records are being used, incorporate flags and reminders into the record management system to support documentation in all relevant fields or consider making them mandatory fields. 

Your healthcare record contains information about your antimicrobial therapy. This includes information on:

  • the medicines you have been prescribed (active ingredients)
  • why they were prescribed and by whom
  • when they were prescribed
  • the dose
  • what form of the medicine you use (such as tablets or an injection)
  • how often you have them
  • how long to use them for
  • any plans to review your treatment.

Quality Statement 7 – Review of therapy

A patient prescribed an antimicrobial has regular clinical review of their therapy, with the frequency of review dependent on patient acuity and risk factors. The need for ongoing antimicrobial use, appropriate microbial spectrum of activity, dose, frequency and route of administration are assessed and adjusted accordingly. Investigation results are reviewed promptly when they are reported.

If antimicrobials are prescribed, review the patient’s progress to assess whether ongoing treatment is needed. If the patient is on intravenous agents, consider oral options to reduce hospital-acquired infections. Ensure the antimicrobial agent and dose are appropriate for the site of the infection and patient parameters (such as renal function).

If microbiological tests are ordered, review the results within 24 hours of them being available, and use this information to consider whether changing or stopping antimicrobials is appropriate.

When prescribing a broad-spectrum antimicrobial, review the patient’s clinical status and any microbiology results to determine whether the patient’s treatment can be switched to a more narrow-spectrum agent to reduce potential patient harms and the risk of developing antimicrobial resistance.

Ensure systems are in place so clinicians regularly review patients who are prescribed antimicrobials, as appropriate to the clinical condition and healthcare setting. In hospital, this includes ceasing antimicrobials when no longer necessary, and reviewing within 48 hours from the first prescription. In the community, this includes communicating with the consumer about signs and symptoms for re-presentation to the clinician or a hospital.

Ensure systems are in place so clinicians review microbiology test results as soon as they are available and use the information to guide antimicrobial treatment decisions. Where electronic healthcare records are in place, consider incorporating flags and reminders into the record management system where possible.

Ensure processes are in place to support clinicians changing from broad-spectrum antimicrobials to appropriate narrow-spectrum agents once the pathogen and its susceptibilities are known, or after review of the patient’s clinical condition and diagnosis. Consider having processes in place to flag potential parenteral to oral switch for antimicrobials.

If you are prescribed a medicine for an infection, your clinician should regularly check that you still need the medicine and that it’s the best medicine for you. If tests have been done to find out what kind of infection you have, your clinician should review these results as soon as they are available. When your infection has improved, it may be appropriate to stop or change how you use this medicine (for example, changing from an injection, infusion or drip to a medicine you take by mouth).

If the cause of your infection is unclear, you may be prescribed a medicine that works against different types of infections. You may need to have tests (such as a blood or urine test) to check if the medicine is working. Depending on the test results, your treatment may need to continue, change or stop.

Quality Statement 8 – Surgical and procedural prophylaxis

A patient having surgery or a procedure is prescribed antimicrobial prophylaxis in accordance with the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines. This includes recommendations about the need for prophylaxis, choice of antimicrobial, dose, route and timing of administration, and duration.

Prescribe, dispense and administer surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis according to the recommendations outlined in the current Therapeutic Guidelines or locally endorsed guidelines. Consider the patient’s clinical condition (for example, colonisation with a multidrug-resistant organism, or patient allergies).

Avoid prescribing antimicrobials post-procedurally, as prolonged antimicrobial use is not usually required. Prescribe according to guidelines with respect to the choice of antimicrobial, dose and optimal timing and consider the route of administration; topical antimicrobials are not recommended for surgical prophylaxis.3 Avoid using off-label routes of administration for antimicrobials such as irrigations, pastes, washes or topical applications for surgical prophylaxis without evidence-based guidelines.

Ensure systems are in place for clinicians to provide appropriate antimicrobial therapy to patients undergoing surgery or a procedure. Ensure these systems are based on the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines.

Ensure systems and processes are in place to allow for the clear documentation of peri-procedural antimicrobial active ingredient, dose, administration time and incision time.

Assess adherence to guidelines regularly as part of a quality improvement approach. Ensure systems are in place to meet the health service organisation’s requirements for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, as part of the National Safety and Quality Health Service Preventing and Controlling Healthcare-Associated Infection Standard.

Before a surgical procedure, medicines may be given to you to reduce the risk of an infection. The prescription will be based on national or local recommendations. After having a surgical procedure, antimicrobials are not usually needed unless you have an infection.

Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic provides national, evidence-based guidelines for antimicrobial use in Australia.3 It is regularly revised, with interim targeted updates made in response to significant changes in evidence and practice, which may be triggered by feedback from the healthcare community. However, in some cases, evidence-based and local adaptations that have been through a formal, robust endorsement process may be more relevant to local patterns of antimicrobial resistance or to specific patient populations requiring a localised approach or with highly specialised diagnoses out of the scope of Therapeutic Guidelines. It is important to ensure that local adaptations of guidelines are based on Therapeutic Guidelines. Any deviation should be accompanied by a clear rationale based on published clinical evidence and local epidemiology, and documented and endorsed by a governing body. Endorsing bodies may include peer review from a drug and therapeutics committee, an antimicrobial stewardship committee, a medicines advisory committee, or equivalent. 

For more information about the requirements of locally endorsed guidelines and antimicrobial formularies, including restriction lists, see page 9 of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard.

Indicators 

The Commission has developed a set of indicators to support clinicians and health services in monitoring how well they implement the care described in this Clinical Care Standard. The indicators are a tool to support local quality improvement activities. No benchmarks are set for any indicator by the Commission.

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard Indicator Monitoring Tool can be used to monitor and report on the Standard, which can be found in our Resource hub.

When using the indicators, please refer to the definitions required to collect and calculate indicator data which are specified online at METEOR.

You can find a description of each indicator below with links to its individual specifications.

Indicator 2a The proportion of antimicrobial prescriptions that are in accordance with the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines
Indicator 2b The proportion of prescriptions for restricted antimicrobials that are in accordance with the locally endorsed approval policy
Indicator 3a The proportion of patients with an adverse reaction to an antimicrobial with comprehensive documentation of the reaction in their healthcare record
Indicator 6a The proportion of prescriptions for which the indication for prescribing the antimicrobial is documented
Indicator 7a The proportion of prescriptions for which an antimicrobial review and updated treatment decision is documented within 48 hours from the first prescription
Indicator 8a The proportion of patients for whom the perioperative prophylactic antimicrobial is prescribed in accordance with the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines
Indicator 8bThe proportion of patients for whom the perioperative prophylactic antimicrobial dose is prescribed in accordance with the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines
Indicator 8cThe proportion of patients who are administered prophylactic antimicrobials within the recommended time perioperatively
Indicator 8d The proportion of patients were prescribed prolonged antimicrobials following a surgery or procedure that is discordant with the current Therapeutic Guidelines or evidence-based, locally endorsed guidelines

Cultural safety and equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples

Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples can be improved by addressing systemic racism and other root causes that reduce access to care. Historical and current contributing factors include a lack of culturally safe care, culturally appropriate health education and sociocultural determinants such as differences in employment opportunities.

The considerations for improving cultural safety and equity in this Clinical Care Standard focus primarily on overcoming cultural power imbalances and improving outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people through better access to health care

Cultural safety and equity recommendations in this document have been developed in consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, clinicians and representative health service organisations. However, it is recognised that cultural safety is determined by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, families and communities experiencing the care.

Recommendations 

When implementing this Clinical Care Standard, cultural safety can be improved through embedding an organisational approach such as described in the recommendations below. Specific considerations for cultural safety for people undergoing colonoscopy are provided throughout this Standard.

When providing care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, particular consideration should be given to the following recommendations.

  • Ensure systems and processes support people to self-report their Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status and to record self-identification.
  • Ensure all staff engage regularly in cultural safety training.
  • Implement the six actions for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health from the NSQHS Standards.
  • Provide flexible service delivery to optimise attendance and help develop trust with individual Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities.
  • Establish robust communication channels and referral pathways with primary healthcare providers (including Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations [ACCHOs]).
  • Where possible, provide outreach services close to home, on Country or in collaboration with ACCHOs or other community healthcare providers.
  • Take a collaborative approach to ensure that interventions are suitably tailored to the individual’s personal needs and preferences for care.
  • Encourage the inclusion of support people, family and kin or the person’s trusted healthcare provider (such as their ACCHO) in all aspects of care, including decision making and planning treatment and management.
  • Engage culturally appropriate interpreter services and cultural translators when this will assist the patient.
  • Involve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers or Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Practitioners as part of a patient’s multidisciplinary team and involve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Liaison Officers in hospital settings.
  • Use culturally and linguistically appropriate materials to aid in communication and discussion, accounting for varying levels of health literacy.

Resource hub

For clinicians and healthcare services

The resources below have been developed to support clinicians and health services to implement the care described in the Standard.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard - Clinician Fact Sheet

Indicator monitoring tool – blank template

Indicator monitoring tool – sample data

Quick Reference guide

An informative webinar describing what's new in the standard was conducted in collaboration with Advanced Pharmacy Australia, formerly the Society of Hospital Pharmacists (SHPA).

For consumers

The Commission has developed the below resource to provide guidance and support. You can use this information to help you and your support people make informed decisions about your care together with your healthcare provider.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard - Consumer Guide

For primary care and community-based clinicians and services

Options for implementation of AMS in primary care

More Commission resources and links related to Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS)

This page includes links to Australian and international resources to support antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs in health service organisations and in aged care and primary care. AMS programs help to improve patient safety and in the prevention and control of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

Story of Excellence

Supporting safer use of antimicrobials with data-driven stewardship

Canberra Health Services, Canberra Hospital (ACT) has been recognised with a 10th Anniversary Clinical Care Standards Excellence Award.

Learn more about how Canberra Health Services tailored their audits to meet local needs and closely monitor new initiatives or watch our webinar - Clinical Care Standards on the frontline: Five Stories of Excellence. 

Find out more

More about the Standard

Medicines used to treat infections are called antimicrobials, and destroy the specific microbes involved. However, when microbes develop ways to prevent the antimicrobial medicine from effectively killing or controlling their growth, that medicine is no longer effective for that infection. This is called antimicrobial resistance.5

Although antimicrobial resistance is a natural feature of microbial evolution, the inappropriate use of antimicrobials has increased the development of antimicrobial-resistant microbes in hospitals, other healthcare facilities and in the community.5,6,7

To help prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance, it is important that healthcare professionals prescribe and administer antimicrobials according to the principles of AMS. 

Read more about the scope and goal of this Standard or see further background in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard

This Standard applies to care provided in the following care settings:

  • all hospital settings, including public and private hospitals, subacute facilities, outpatient and day procedure services
  • emergency services, including ambulance services
  • general practice and other community and primary healthcare settings such as Hospital in the Home, Aboriginal community controlled health services, dental practices and community pharmacies
  • residential aged care services. 

Not all quality statements in this Standard will be applicable to every healthcare service or clinical unit. Healthcare services should consider their individual circumstances in determining how to apply each statement. 

When implementing this Standard, healthcare services should consider:

  • the context in which care is provided
  • local variation
  • quality improvement priorities of the individual healthcare service. 

In rural and remote settings, different strategies may be needed to implement the standard. For example, the use of:

  • hub‑and‑spoke models integrating larger and smaller health services and ACCHOs
  • telehealth consultations
  • multidisciplinary teams including allied health involvement where clinically appropriate.

This Standard relates to the care all people (neonates, children, young adults and adults) should receive when they have, or are suspected of having, an infection or require an antimicrobial for prophylaxis. It covers patient care from the time of prophylaxis or diagnosis to cure of an infection and has been developed for use in a variety of healthcare settings. It also includes the consideration of conditions for which antimicrobials are not recommended.

Assessment to the NSQHS Standards

The Commission has developed information about assessment to the NSQHS Standards and resources to support implementation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard.

Antimicrobial stewardship is a requirement for all health service organisations assessed against the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards, as described in the 2021 Preventing and Controlling Infections Standard, and specifically Action 3.18.

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard Indicator Monitoring Tool (the AMS Monitoring Tool) and resources have been developed to support health service organisations and AMS teams monitor the care they provide. The AMS Monitoring tool can be used to help implement Actions 3.18 and 3.19 of the NSQHS Standards.

The Commission is committed to supporting healthcare services to provide culturally safe and equitable healthcare to all Australians. 

Person-centred care recognises and respects differences in individual needs, beliefs, and culture. The Commission: 

  • is committed to supporting healthcare services to provide culturally safe and equitable healthcare to all Australians
  • acknowledges that discrimination and inequity are significant barriers to achieving high‑quality health outcomes for some patients from culturally and linguistically diverse communities

Culturally safe service provision and environments are those where the places, people, policies and practices foster mutual respect, shared decision making, and an understanding of cultural, linguistic and spiritual perspectives and differences. Cultural safety is supported by organisations and individuals that recognise cultural power imbalances and actively address them by: 

  • ensuring access to and use of interpreter services or cultural translators when this will assist the patient and aligns with their wishes
  • providing visual or written information in a language that the patient, their family and carers will understand
  • providing cultural competency training for all staff
  • encouraging clinicians to review their own beliefs and attitudes when treating and communicating with patients
  • identifying variation in healthcare provision or outcomes for specific patient populations, including those based on ethnicity, and responding accordingly.

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard has been endorsed by 25 key professional organisations and colleges including: 

  • Advanced Pharmacy Australia, formerly the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia
  • Australasian College for Emergency Medicine
  • Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
  • Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases
  • Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists
  • Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
  • Australian College of Nurse Practitioners
  • Australian College of Nursing
  • Australian College of Perioperative Nurses (ACORN)
  • Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine
  • Australian Dental Association
  • Australian Society of Antimicrobials
  • Council of Remote Area Nurses of Australia
  • NPS MedicineWise
  • NSW Therapeutic Advisory Group
  • Optometry Australia
  • Pharmaceutical Society of Australia
  • Pharmacy Guild of Australia
  • Royal Australasian College of Medical Administrators
  • Royal Australasian College of Physicians
  • Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists
  • Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia
  • The Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons
  • Therapeutic Guidelines Ltd.

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard was formally endorsed by Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council members in 2014.

The Commission develops Clinical Care Standards taking into account:

  • advice from multidisciplinary topic working groups which include clinicians, consumers, and researchers
  • consultation with key stakeholders including consumer bodies, professional organisations, and state and territory health departments. 

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard Topic Working Group provided expert advice on the development and review of the Standard. In addition, a targeted consultation process was conducted with key stakeholders.

The role of the Topic Working Group was to:

  • advise on the scope and key components of care for the Standard
  • advise on key sources of evidence including clinical practice guidelines, standards and empirical literature to build upon the body evidence supporting the existing model
  • advise on the formulation of quality statements and supporting indicators
  • recommend strategies to support the implementation of the Standard
  • actively support raising awareness of the Standard.

All members were required to disclose financial, personal and professional interests that could, or could be perceived to, influence a decision made, or advice given to the Commission. Disclosures are updated prior to each meeting and managed in line with the Commission’s Policy on Disclosure of Interests.

The quality statements in the Standard are based on the best available evidence and guideline recommendations at the time of development.

Key sources that underpin the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard are current clinical guidelines including:

  • Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship in Australian Health Care (2018)
  • Cochrane review of interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients
  • Public Health England’s Antimicrobial prescribing and stewardship competencies
  • Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
     

Evaluation findings

Evaluation of the AMS Clinical Care Standard was undertaken as part of its review in 2020. The evaluation found that: 

  • 99% of respondent reported that the AMS Clinical Care Standard was relevant to their practice
  • 73% of respondents reported changes at an organisational level as a result of implementing the AMS Clinical Care Standard

Find more results in the evaluation report.

The references below are not a complete list of references for the Standard. A full reference list is published in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard which can be downloaded here

  1. Sepsis as defined by the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). See the glossary in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard for further information.
  2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Consensus Statement: essential elements for safe and high-quality end-of-life care. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2015.
  3. Therapeutic Guidelines. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; accessed Jan 2026. https://www.tg.org.au
  4. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Reporting adverse events [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2019
  5. Department of Health. Australia's National Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy – 2020 and Beyond. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2019
  6. World Health Organization. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: WHO, 2015
  7. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Australian Health Care 2018. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2018

Last updated: 27 March 2026