Emergency Laparotomy Clinical Care Standard
What is an emergency laparotomy?
Emergency laparotomy is a high-risk, high-cost procedure associated with significant variation in outcomes, and in the way care is delivered, internationally and within Australia.1-3 More than 15,000 Australians undergo an emergency laparotomy each year with mortality estimates ranging from 6.2%, to more than 20% in older people and people with comorbidities.2, 4
The Australia and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit – Quality Improvement (ANZELA-QI) and the UK’s National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) have identified wide inter-hospital variation in emergency laparotomy care including the use of preoperative risk assessment and frailty assessment, time to surgery, and postoperative admission to critical care and physician review for high-risk patients. Considerable variation in outcomes has also been identified including in-hospital mortality, length of stay and complication rates.1, 2, 5, 6
In leading this work, the Commission will work collaboratively with key stakeholders, and with guidance from an expert topic working group, to:
- identify and describe key evidence-based standards that will drive quality improvement in care processes and outcomes for people undergoing emergency laparotomy in Australia
- develop indicators to support local monitoring and quality improvement efforts related to the standards of care
- develop a Clinical Care Standard that enhances and supports existing efforts and initiatives to improve the quality of care and outcomes for people undergoing emergency laparotomy
- identify strategies, and develop resources, to support the dissemination and implementation of the Clinical Care Standard.
About the Standard
Coming soon
The first national Emergency Laparotomy Clinical Care Standard will be officially launched at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Annual Scientific Congress on 1 May 2026.
Who was consulted on the Standard’s development?
Clinicians, consumers and healthcare services will be consulted during the development of the Standard, which will include a public consultation period. The Commission has established a Topic Working Group (TWG) to provide advice and guidance throughout the development of the Standard. The TWG is a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, researchers and consumers from around Australia.
Next steps
- A high-level summary of the activities and timeframes to deliver this Clinical Care Standard are provided in the table below.
- These timelines are subject to change.
| Activity | Timeframes |
|---|---|
| Project initiation, stakeholder engagement, background research | Nov 2024 – Feb 2025 |
| Establish Topic Working Group (TWG) | Jan – Feb 2025 |
| Define scope and draft quality statements and indicators with TWG | Mar 2025 – Aug 2026 |
| Public consultation on draft standard | Sep – Oct 2025 |
| Post-consultation review and final drafts | Oct – Dec 2025 |
| Approval and endorsement | Jan – Apr 2026 |
| Launch | May 2026 |
References
- NELA Project Team. Ninth Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. London: 2024.
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Second ANZELA-QI Program Summary Report - 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 - Australian and New Zealand National Emergency Laparotomy Audit—Quality Improvement. Available from: https://www.surgeons.org/research-audit/morbidity-audits/morbidity-audits-managed-by-racs/anz-emergency-laparotomy-audit-quality-improvement.
- Burmas M, Aitken RJ, Broughton KJ. Outcomes following emergency laparotomy in Australian public hospitals. ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):998-1002.
- Fagan G, Barazanchi A, Coulter G, Leeman M, Hill AG, Eglinton TW. New Zealand and Australia emergency laparotomy mortality rates compare favourably to international outcomes: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2583-2591.
- Oliver CM, Bassett MG, Poulton TE, Anderson ID, Murray DM, Grocott MP, et al. Organisational factors and mortality after an emergency laparotomy: multilevel analysis of 39 903 National Emergency Laparotomy Audit patients. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1346-1356.
- James Aitken R, Griffiths B, Van Acker J, O'Loughlin E, Fletcher D, Treacy JP, et al. Two-year outcomes from the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit-Quality Improvement pilot study. ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2575-2582.