Skip to main content
Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard icon

Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard

Serious adverse events such as unexpected death and cardiac arrest are often preceded by observable physiological and clinical abnormalities. Other serious events such as suicide or aggression are also often preceded by observed or reported changes in a person's behaviours or mood that can indicate a deterioration in their mental state.

The Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard describes the systems and processes needed to effectively respond to patients when their physical, mental or cognitive condition deteriorates.

Intention of this standard

The Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard aims to ensure that a person's acute deterioration is recognised promptly and appropriate action is taken. Acute deterioration includes physiological changes, as well as acute changes in cognition and mental state.

There are 13 actions in the Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard, and they are categorised by criteria and item. Each action has reflective questions and key tasks to help you understand and meet each action.

Clinical governance and quality improvement to support recognition and response systems

Organisation-wide systems are used to support and promote detection and recognition of acute deterioration, and the response to patients whose condition acutely deteriorates. These systems are consistent with:

 

Integrating clinical governance

Action 8.01

Action 8.01 states

Clinicians use the safety and quality systems from the Clinical Governance Standard when:

  1. Implementing policies and procedures for recognising and responding to acute deterioration
  2. Managing risks associated with recognising and responding to acute deterioration
  3. Identifying training requirements for recognising and responding to acute deterioration

Safety and quality systems support clinicians in recognising and responding to acute deterioration.

  • How are the health service organisation’s safety and quality systems used to:
    • support implementation of policies and procedures for recognising and responding to acute deterioration
    • identify and manage risks associated with recognising and responding to acute deterioration
    • identify training requirements for recognising and responding to acute deterioration?
  • Establish and implement governance structures for recognising and responding to acute deterioration
  • Develop and implement policies and procedures for recognising and responding to acute deterioration
  • Use risk management systems to identify, monitor, manage and review risks associated with recognising and responding to acute deterioration
  • Develop and provide training to the workforce on recognising and responding to acute deterioration.

Applying quality improvement systems

Action 8.02

Action 8.02 states

The health service organisation applies the quality improvement system from the Clinical Governance Standard when:

  1. Monitoring recognition and response systems
  2. Implementing strategies to improve recognition and response systems
  3. Reporting on effectiveness and outcomes of recognition and response systems

Quality improvement systems are used to support recognition of, and response to, acute deterioration.

  • How are the health service organisation’s recognition and response systems continuously evaluated and improved?
  • How are the outcomes of improvement activities reported to the governing body, the workforce, consumers and other organisations?
  • Review, measure, and assess the effectiveness and performance of, recognition and response systems
  • Implement quality improvement strategies for recognition and response systems based on the outcomes of monitoring activities
  • Provide information on the outcomes of quality improvement activities to the governing body, the workforce, consumers and other organisations.

Partnering with consumers

Action 8.03

Action 8.03 states

Clinicians use organisational processes from the Partnering with Consumers Standard when recognising and responding to acute deterioration to:

  1. Actively involve patients in their own care
  2. Meet the patient’s information needs
  3. Share decision-making

Clinicians understand the systems for partnering with consumers and use them when recognising and responding to acute deterioration.

  • What processes from the Partnering with Consumers Standard do clinicians use to involve patients in planning and making decisions about recognising and responding to acute deterioration?
  • How does the health service organisation collect feedback from patients about information provided on recognising and responding to acute deterioration?

Detecting and recognising acute deterioration, and escalating care

Acute deterioration is detected and recognised, and action is taken to escalate care.

Recognising acute deterioration

Action 8.04

Action 8.04 states

The health service organisation has processes for clinicians to detect acute physiological deterioration that require clinicians to:

  1. Document individualised vital sign monitoring plans
  2. Monitor patients as required by their individualised monitoring plan
  3. Graphically document and track changes in agreed observations to detect acute deterioration over time, as appropriate for the patient

Patients with acute physiological deterioration are identified early.

  • What systems are in place for documenting vital sign monitoring plans?
  • What processes are used to ensure that there is enough equipment for patient monitoring?
  • How does the health service organisation ensure that clinicians have the skills to monitor patients according to their monitoring plan?
  • What processes are in place for documenting vital sign observations graphically and over time?
  •  Implement a system for documenting vital sign monitoring plans
  • Ensure that clinicians have the necessary skills and equipment to monitor patients as required by their individualised monitoring plans
  • Implement an observation chart or other mechanism for graphically documenting vital sign observations and tracking changes over time.

Action 8.05

Action 8.05 states

The health service organisation has processes for clinicians to recognise acute deterioration in mental state that require clinicians to:

  1. Monitor patients at risk of acute deterioration in mental state, including patients at risk of developing delirium
  2. Include the person’s known early warning signs of deterioration in mental state in their individualised monitoring plan
  3. Assess possible causes of acute deterioration in mental state, including delirium, when changes in behaviour, cognitive function, perception, physical function or emotional state are observed or reported
  4. Determine the required level of observation
  5. Document and communicate observed or reported changes in mental state

Adverse outcomes relating to acute deterioration in a person’s mental state are prevented through early recognition and effective response.

  • How does the health service organisation ensure that clinicians are trained to be alert for the signs of acute deterioration in a person’s mental state?
  • How does this apply to people who have not been identified as being at high risk of deterioration in mental state?
  • Use comprehensive care plans to guide monitoring of people who are at risk of acute deterioration in mental state, incorporating knowledge from the person, and their carers and families about individual early warning signs
  • Ensure that members of the workforce are alert to signs of deterioration in a person’s mental state, including for people who have not been previously identified as being at high risk
  • Ensure that members of the workforce are alert to the signs of delirium
  • Ensure that members of the workforce can implement an initial response and keep the person safe until arrangements are made for specialist review.

Escalating care

Action 8.06

Action 8.06 states

The health service organisation has protocols that specify criteria for escalating care, including:

  1. Agreed vital sign parameters and other indicators of physiological deterioration
  2. Agreed indicators of deterioration in mental state
  3. Agreed parameters and other indicators for calling emergency assistance
  4. Patient pain or distress that is not able to be managed using available treatment
  5. Worry or concern in members of the workforce, patients, carers and families about acute deterioration

The health service organisation has an effective system for escalation of care to minimise risks for patients who are acutely deteriorating.

  • What protocols are used to specify the criteria for escalating care?
  • Work with clinical groups to agree on parameters that indicate acute deterioration and require escalation of care
  • Develop and implement protocols for escalating care when acute deterioration in a patient’s condition is detected.

Action 8.07

Action 8.07 states

The health service organisation has processes for patients, carers or families to directly escalate care

Patients, family members and carers can directly escalate care.

  • What processes are in place for patients, carers or families to directly escalate care?
  • Develop and implement a system for patients, carers and families to directly escalate care.

Action 8.08

Action 8.08 states

The health service organisation provides the workforce with mechanisms to escalate care and call for emergency assistance

The health service organisation has mechanisms for the workforce to escalate care.

  • What mechanisms are in place for the workforce to escalate care and call for emergency assistance?
  • Provide the workforce with mechanisms to escalate care and call for emergency assistance.

Action 8.09

Action 8.09 states

The workforce uses the recognition and response systems to escalate care

Members of the workforce take prompt action to deal with acute deterioration.

  • How does the health service organisation ensure that the workforce knows how and when to use the recognition and response systems?
  • Escalate care when acute deterioration is recognised.

Responding to acute deterioration

Appropriate and timely care is provided to patients whose condition is acutely deteriorating.

Responding to deterioration

Action 8.10

Action 8.10 states

The health service organisation has processes that support timely response by clinicians with the skills required to manage episodes of acute deterioration

Clinicians have the skills and knowledge to deal with deterioration, as appropriate for their role.

  • How does the health service organisation ensure that clinicians are competent in the skills required to respond to patients whose condition is acutely deteriorating?
  • Develop systems to ensure that clinicians are competent in the skills required to respond to patients whose condition is deteriorating.

Action 8.11

Action 8.11 states

The health service organisation has processes to ensure rapid access at all times to at least one clinician, either on site or in close proximity, who can deliver advanced life support

Expert input and assistance is available to manage acute physiological deterioration.

  • What processes are in place to ensure that clinicians who are competent in providing advanced life support are available to respond to patients who acutely deteriorate?
  • Provide a system to ensure rapid access to advanced life support for patients who acutely deteriorate.

Action 8.12

Action 8.12 states

The health service organisation has processes to ensure rapid referral to mental health services to meet the needs of patients whose mental state has acutely deteriorated

Care for patients whose mental state is deteriorating is escalated safely and effectively.

  • How does the health service organisation ensure that the workforce knows the local processes for escalating care to mental health specialists?
  • What partnerships are in place to help patients gain access to mental health services if they are not provided within the health service organisation?
  • How are patients, carers and families informed about rapid referral to mental health services?
  • Develop a protocol for escalating care when a person’s mental state is deteriorating, which includes designation of roles and responsibilities for members of the healthcare workforce and time frames for response
  • Develop partnerships with other relevant organisations if responding to acute deterioration in a person’s mental state is outside the scope of the health service organisation
  • Ensure that members of the workforce are aware of, and use, the escalation protocol.

Action 8.13

Action 8.13 states

The health service organisation has processes for rapid referral to services that can provide definitive management of acute physical deterioration

Patients who need other services to resolve the cause of their acute deterioration are rapidly referred to these services.

  • What services may be required by patients who acutely deteriorate but cannot be safely provided?
  • What referral mechanisms are in place to ensure that patients whose acute deterioration cannot be definitively managed within the health service organisation are rapidly referred to other organisations?
  • Map the causes of acute deterioration against the capacity of the health service organisation to provide for their definitive management
  • If the organisation is not able to provide definitive care, develop systems for rapid referral of patients with acute deterioration to other services.

Last updated: 29 April 2026